Dear Tango7,
You raise an interesting issue--that of health care tourism. It is not surprising that consumers, who have long ago discovered that cheap labor in foreign countries means cheaper products, have now discovered that outsourcing in the service industry is a less expensive way to go. The question of foreign outsourcing makes for interesting discussion-- not only in the economic sense, but also the political. There is nothing unique about health care that makes it immune to the lure of cheap foreign labor. And as is the case in other product industries, cheap labor no longer equates with inferiority-- witness the imminent demise of the U.S. auto industry in the face of foreign competition that is viewed as producing a superior product. Not a few foreign-born doctors come to the U.S. for professional training and then return to their respective native countries to practice-- often in a manner consistent with U.S. standards. In fact, members of my wife's family have been known to return to their native Colombia for health care service when facing medical issues that have not been satisfactorily met here in the States.
However, notwithstanding the focus of this forum, it is usually shortsighted to select a doctor based on his fees alone--whether domestically or in a foreign country. (This is not to trivialize the very real problem of the cost of health care, which has created an insurmountable obstacle between a large proportion of our population and the services they need. In fact, the American Dental Association has been under recent pressure to devise alternate sources of dental service in communities where access to care is difficult.) To be fair, the people who are going to fly to Bangkok for root canal are not the indigent people in rural communities, and not the elderly or infirm, but the relatively affluent who are most concerned with saving money. In exchange for these savings, they may be sacrificing in several areas that merit some notice:
- The quality of the care one will receive from a particular doctor in a foreign country is more difficult to assess in advance. Anyone who has read this forum will know my preference for selecting a doctor based on personal referral, and few foreign-based doctors will be selected by anything more than the sort of advertising web site you reference. While I won't disparage the reputation of any country, it is intuitively true that competence varies from doctor to doctor--not only here in the States, but in other countries as well. I wouldn't select a doctor based on a web ad, and I don't believe that most discriminating minds would, either
- A major reason why health care is so expensive in this country is that providers must come into compliance with a myriad of laws and governmental regulations that don't exist elsewhere. We could debate at length at whether these laws and regulations have merit (certainly, not all of them do), but most laws and regulations governing the health professions are ostensibly intended to serve the public good. Regulations dealing with competence, licensure, the procedural specifics of how health service is implemented, and avenues of redress that are available to a consumer who has been injured by negligent care-- these are much less stringent in many other countries.
- Most importantly, continuity of care is much more difficult to maintain if service is sought thousands of miles away from where you live. This may be less of an issue for a single, major medical procedure, but is a major detriment for something like dental care, which is universally considered a regular, ongoing process of health maintenance (at least, by those who have prioritized dental care rationally in their lives). In the example you provided, it is unlikely that anyone casual enough to have allowed the need for three root canal treatments to accumulate will be going back to Thailand every six months for a checkup or periodontal maintenance procedures. Not only is the coordination of specialty service and primary care that much more difficult, but the amount of enthusiasm many patients have for dentistry would be severely challenged by the effort of setting aside time and effort for regular travel.
And by the way--there are several managed care plans right here in this country where the established fee for a single-canal root canal treatment is not much more than your cited $196. Of course, dentists who participate in these plans have developed strategies for working the system-- and there is no reason to believe that there aren't dentists in Bangkok who employ similar strategies. Quoted from the linked site you provided:
"If you know or think you need dental treatment, find out what needs doing before coming to Bangkok."..."Private clinics in Bangkok make money by providing treatment and if you don't need any, they don't make much money and os it's best to go knowing what needs doing and this way getting your teeth fixed in Bangkok might be a very costs effect means of dental treatment..." (sic).
Caveat emptor applies-- not only here in the U.S., but everywhere...